Nam,+Do+Hyun+Block+G+2011

** Unit 3 **
 * David Nam **

An Age of Exploration and Isolation

China : A missed opportunity for global dominance


 * Christianity and Muslim Chart - David**

planning for the essay - David Nam


 * 1) How did the Ottomans treat non-Muslims? - They did not have military service, however they had to pay Taxes. They were not allowed to believe in any religion they wanted to believe in.
 * 2) What were Suleyman's major accomplishments? - He expanded the empire and compared with the Roman Empire. He made good and fair laws and rules for the empire.
 * 3) Despite their brilliant rule, what critical mistake did Suleiman and Shah Abbas make? - The kings were afraid that they might get killed by the power of their sons.
 * 4) What evidence of cultural blending can you find in Akbar's rule? - The language that is most used in India and Middle Asia is called "Urdu".
 * 5) How did Akbar's successors contribute to the end of the Mughal Empire? - The citizens made them rebel and the empire fell down. It did not stay any longer. The successors did not abandon the religion.


 * 1) === **What were the CAUSES of the Scientific Revolution? Which one do you think is MOST significant AND WHY? - A few scholars published work that challenged the ideas of the ancient thinkers and the church. As these scholars replaced old assumptions with new theories, they launched a change in European thought that historians call the Scientific Revolution. I think Revolution Model of the Universe is most significant because it was a earlier scientific thinking came in the field of astronomy.** ===
 * 2) === **Why might those in positions of authority at the time (Church and government) tend to reject new ideas? - Galileo's findings frightened both Catholic and Protestant leaders because they went against church teaching and authority. If people believed the church could be wrong about this, they could question other church teachings as well.** ===
 * 3) === **Do you agree with Galileo's actions during his trial? Explain. - I do not agree with Galileo's theory because he did not defend the ideas of Copernicus. If he defended his idea, then another scientific method would have been out.** ===
 * 4) === **Make a list of the major figures of this revolution in thinking and what they did. - There are Revolutionary model of the universe, the law of gravity by Newton, scientific instruments, medicine and the human body, and discoveries in chemistry.** ===
 * 5) === **Explain the significance of these terms:** ===
 * **Geocentric Theory : Geocentric Theory states that earth is in the center of the universe.**
 * **Heliocentric Theory : Heliocentric Theory states that sun is int the center of the universe.**
 * **Scientific Revolution : Scientific Revolution was a new way of thinking about the natural world.**
 * **Scientific method : The revolution in scientific thinking that Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo began eventually developed into a new approach to science called the scientific method.**

Why Europe gains dominance? In the Renassiance there were many scientists, artists, and adventurers that changed Europe in various kinds of ways. The Heliocentric is a idea that sun is in the center of the universe. Heliocentric proved that geocentric was wrong. The bible says that the earth is in the cent of the universe and it is called the geocentric. People began to question the church. Church had power in the spiritual and civil society. They struggled in the society.

textbook page 37~39

1. How did the cities of Italy help create the Renaissance? - Renaissance is a movement that started in Italy caused an explosion of creativity in art, writing, and thought that lasted approximately from 1300 to 1600. The term means rebirth, and in this context, it refers to a revival of art and learning. The educated people of Italy hoped to bring the culture and classical Greece and Rome. This made innovative styles of art and literature.

2. What is your opinion of the Medici family? - Since the late 1200s, the city - state of Florence had a republican form of government, but then Florence came under the rule of one powerful banking family the Medici. The Medici has branch offices throughout Italy and major cities in Europe. They collected interest and made money and became very powerful and rich.

3. How did Humanism influence Renaissance ideas? - Humanism was an intellectual movement that focused on human potential and achievements instead of those of god. It influenced the artists, architects, sculptures to carry on the classical traditions.

4. Why did church leaders and wealthy merchants support the arts? - They supported the arts to demonstrate their social standing and their importance.

5. What were the similarities and differences between upper-class Renaissance men and women? - They both were highly educated but the Renaissance women had lower chance to get involved in the politics.

6. After reading the "Analyzing Primary Sources" box, respond to this question: Do the qualities called for in the ideal Renaissance man and woman seem to emphasize the individual or the group? Give evidence in the documents to back up your answer! - I think the primary resource about the Renaissance women and men is about to emphasize individuals. For example, perfection includes in the society and it is needed to emphasize another.

David Nam FAMILY HISTORY PROJECT

1. In section 1, //Heretical Beliefs//, the historian gives his account of a historical event. What is happening to Hogsflesh? What is the historian's “story” or main point of the article? a) John Hogflesh had to become almost naked for few days, carry a bundle of faggots, and go to the market place and read the statement of heretical beliefs. The historian's main point of this article is that church back in the days were very powerful in order to control the society.

2. What are the roles of a historian defined by John Arnold? Do you agree or disagree with his assumptions? Can you think of any other roles? a) Historians have roles that are to report and interperet each other. I agree that John Arnold's idea how to interpret and talk with other historians and understand each other more better.

3. What is meant by "treat(ing) their sources with fidelity?" Remember to put your reponse in your own words. Why is it important to remember this when reading historical references? a) Treating their sources with fidelity simply means historians believing in their recordings.

4. How can a single event be interpreted in more than one way? Can you think of an event in your life that historians could interpret with differing points of view? a) Single event could be interpreted in more than one way because different people can see it in other different ways. One example, when I was in the elementary school, I lived in Canada with my mom and my brother. My dad was in Korea by himself. I went to Canada to study English. Most of the Koreans I knew in Canada were like us, but Canadians did not understand why we lived seperately. They had might as think, is education more important then family?

5. Talk to a family member or friend about something that happened to you both a long time ago. Examine how you both remember the incident and write about it. With that in mind, when attaching meaning to history, is it possible for a historian to be completely objective? Use examples from the incident you just discussed to reinforce your response. a) There was one incident with my younger brother when I was grade 5~6. We argued is being an older sibling better than being younger. Being older needs to be responsible. Also, older siblings have to be a role- model for younger sibling. So being older is not always better. However, my brother thought that if you are older, than you could control younger people and lead the way.I do not think historians were completely objective.They would have stayed neutral side since they all have different thoughts and various opinions.

6. What problems may arise when historians practice subjective history? In what ways may subjective history be beneficial to the study of history? Think back to the incident you just discussed with your family member or friend. Why did it make sense for you to remember the event the way you did and for the other person to remember it the way he or she did? What does this tell us about history? a) There would be problems such as arguing about different and diffucult situations and opinions from them. It would have came out less. They would have cared about their own benefit.I think looking at a subjective way could have been beneficial to the study of history because there would have been more opinions and thoughts.

7. Why is every historian "a storyteller?" If all historians are storytellers and there are myriad versions of every story, can we trust historians? Why or why not? a) Every historian is a storyteller because they give you a fact and they interpret themselves. We could not trust the historians because people could see the point of view in many different ways and understand in other thoughts. If they only gave out the facts, then we could have trusted the historians.

8. How did your view of history and historians change based on this reading? How will you approach history now that you have explored these views? a) My point of view of history and historians changed a lot based on this reading. I thought history was all about memorizingm but after reading this article, there were many facts and different opinions from the historians. From now on, I would think and analyze the facts to by myself.

__ Vocabualry __

Heretical: Of relating to, or characterized by departure from accpeted beliefs or standards.

Faggot: A bundle of sticks - symbolized his convinction for heresy

Eucharist: Christian science spiritual communion with god

Abstain: To refrain from something by one's own choice

Penance: A punishment undergone in token of penitence for sin

Beseeching: To address and earnest or urgent request to implore

Source: The point at which something springs into being or form which it derives or is obtained

Why is an understanding of culture necessary in order to understand history?

Culture is necessary in order to understand history because history and culture‍‍‍ is ‍‍‍related to each other. If you get culture of the country, then you could simply figure out the history of the country. Culture includes traditions, food, language, and religion. For example, as slavery in America, South pleasured themselves by making their slaves to do all their work. However, North thought it was a cruel situation and disagreed against the south. As a perspective to the Koreans, the culture that is important is to respect the elders. Koreans had been respecting the elders when it was back a ancient times. ‍‍‍Knowing many cultural facts will help to understand the country’s history. ‍‍‍

Chart for Christianity & Islam Christianity Chart - David