Park,+Jeong+Soo+Block+G+2011

=**Jeongsoo Park** = **Ant Farm-Diary Entry** Enlightenment Despot-JeongsooPark **Unit 3-From Absolutism to Revolution**

**Japan APPARTS**

Age of Exploration- Jeongsoo Park

China Dynasty

**Muslim Empire TEEL-JeongsooPark**

(Jeongsoo Park, Annie Na, Daniel Lim) - Eastern Orthodoxy -Roman Catholicism -Protestantism God Holy Spirit 12 Disciples || - Jesus is the son of God - Resurrection of Jesus Christ - The Bible are the words of God and is infallible - The belief of Hell&Heaven - The second form of Jesus Christ coming back on Earth -Virgin birth of Jesus Christ || All around the world ||
 * Name of Religion || Branches of it || Area Where it Started || Key People in it || Tenets || Regions of the Word where it is found ||
 * Christianity || - Early Christian Church
 * Lutherism
 * Anglicanism
 * Calvinism || Jerusalem (Present day Israel) || Jesus Christ

 "Christianity - ReligionFacts." //Religion, World Religions, Comparative Religion - Just the Facts on the World's Religions.// ReligionFacts, 2004. Web. 28 Sept. 2011. _ < [] >. Oakes, John. "Where Did Christianity Originate?" //Evidence for Christianity - Home//. Evidence for Christianity. Web. 28 Sept. 2011. _ < [] >. "The Basic Tenets of Christianity." //Www.bible-knowledge.com///. Bilble Knowledge. Web. 28 Sept. 2011. < [] >.

Shiite Ahmadiyya Druze || Saudi Arabia (Mecca) || Muhammad || The Five Pillars of Islam There is only one God Correct practices and prayers should be done 5 times a day Donate money for the poor (charity) Fast during the month of Ramadan Pilgrimage to Mecca || Upper half of Africa Parts of Asia ||
 * Name of Religion || Branches of it || Area Where it started || Key People in it || Tenets || Regions of the World where it is found ||
 * Islam || Sunni

Jeongsoo Park's planning page

1. How did the Ottomans treat non-Muslims?


 * The Ottomans ruled kindly through local officials,the Ottomans made non-Muslims to pay taxes but did not have to serve in the army.**

2. What were Suleyman's major accomplishments?


 * Suleyman led the empire to it's highest power. Suleyman conquered southeastern Europe and parts of North Africa.**

3. Despite their brilliant rule, what critical mistake did Suleiman and Shah Abbas make?


 * Despite their brilliant rule, Suleiman and Shah Abbas murdered their sons thinking them as a threat to their power. All sons who had good potential to be a good king died, which led to the sons who did not have the potential to be a good king to be a king.**

4. What evidence of cultural blending can you find in Akbar's rule?


 * Akbar's rule judged people by their future potential or merit and not necessarily by their cultural heritage. **

5. How did Akbar's successors contribute to the end of the Mughal Empire?


 * Akbar's successors contributed to end the Mughal Empire by forming strict rules and putting on heavier taxes. However, this led to weakening the Empire and eventually allowing other Empires to overrule the Mughal Empire**


 * 1) What were the CAUSES of the Scientific Revolution? Which one do you think is MOST significant AND WHY?
 * The cause of the scientific revolution was the questioning of the works few scholars published and the church. I believe the questioning of the church or “the questioning” was most significant because it lead people to think and face the reality while**


 * 1) Why might those in positions of authority at the time (Church and government) tend to reject new ideas?
 * At the time, Church and government tend to reject new ideas because, they thought new ideas would make people with new knowledge and lead to questioning the church and the system how they operate.**


 * 1) Do you agree with Galileo's actions during his trial? Explain.
 * I agree with Galileo’s actions during his trial because I believe everyone would do the same action that he took during his trial when the Pope threatened him to be tortured if he does not agree with the following request.**


 * 1) Make a list of the major figures of this revolution in thinking and what they did.
 * Copernicus**- First person to officially present the idea of Heliocentrism during the Renaissance
 * Brahe**- Followed Copernicus' studies and beliefs by recording and tracking planetary data
 * Kepler**- Followed Brahe's work on a mathematical scale
 * Galileo**- Built and published new ideas of astronomy
 * Bacon**- Encouraged scientists to experiment then draw conclusions
 * Descartes**- Advanced analytical geometry and provided another tool for scientific research.
 * Newton**- Explained his research and his beliefs about the law of gravity.


 * 1) Explain the significance of these terms:
 * a. Geocentric Theory**- stated that the Earth was the center of the universe. **b. Heliocentric Theory**- Copernicus proved that the sun was the center of the universe.
 * c. Scientific Revolution**- Described as the period of a new way of thinking about the world. Scientific Revolution led scientists to discovery diverse new theories and questions the false facts
 * 1) **Scientific method**-The procedure of experimenting and gathering ideas. It started it off by asking questions, research, creating hypothesis, experimenting, analyzing results and drawing a conclusion.

‘How did the Renaissance contribute to the opening of the mind in Europe?'

The Renaissance contributed to the opening of the mind in Europe because due to the Renaissance the Europeans started to accept and come up with new ideas that started to improve Europe. Also, Europeans started to fix false facts, and they question the Catholic Church’s authorities. During the Middle Age, it was the time where everything stopped. The government was powerless and people were not educated. The church over powered the government and had total control of the European society.However, after the black death, Europeans thought that it was time to improve and develop,which is also known as the Renaissance period. Europeans started to challenge well known theories for instance, the geocentrism which changed to heliocentrism or stating that the earth was round. Also, Europeans started to accept the fact that all men and women should be educated. Those who were cable of doing diverse subjects were known as the Renaissance men or women. Life was more based on humans than religion and art and literature were consider the core of daily life. Due to these effects, Europe was the strongest continent during that time.

Why Europe gains dominance At that time, Europe was developing rapidly due to the Renaissance, science, art, math,politics and questioning the ideas started to improve and it is known that, countries with knowledge and that are developed are to gain power. Not only Europe started to gain knowledge but they explored around the world accepting new objects and as they explored, they gained land and new information. People started to question the church and ideas that improved and established wrong information.

1. How did the cities of Italy help create the Renaissance? Italy had three advantages that made it the birthplace of the Renaissance. Thriving cities, a wealthy merchant class, and the classical heritage of Greece and Rome.

2. What is your opinion of the Medici family? Although Medici family were dictators, I believe they were a good models of art patrons and the fact that they focused rebuilding Florence as an art cit.

3. How did Humanism influence Renaissance ideas? The idea of humanism focused on human potential and achievements.Humanists influenced artists and architects to carry on classical traditions. Also, humanists popularized the study of subjects,such as history,literature, and philosophy.

4. Why did church leaders and wealthy merchants support the arts? Church leaders supported the arts because it beautified cities and churches. Also,merchants and wealthy families also supported the arts. By having their portraits painted or by donating art to the city to place in public squares, the wealthy demonstrated their own importance.

What were the similarities and differences between upper-class Renaissance men and women? Renaissance writers introduced the idea that all educated people were expected to create art. A man should be charming,witty, and well educated in the classics. He should dance, sing, play music, and write poetry. In addition, he should be a skilled rider, wrestler, and swordsman. While women should be classics and be charming but they should not seek fame. They were expected to inspire art but not create it. However, Renaissance women were better educated than medieval women.

6. After reading the "Analyzing Primary Sources" box, respond to this question: Do the qualities called for in the ideal Renaissance man and woman seem to emphasize the individual or the group? Give evidence in the documents to back up your answer! I think the qualities called for in the ideal Renaissance man and woman seem to emphasize the on the group because it said “Let the man we are seeking be very bold, stem and always among the first,where the enemy are to be seen.” I assume that this statement wanted a group of people to be a Renaissance man with a Renaissance attitude/behavior.



Jeongsoo Park's Family History




Vocabulary
 * heretical: **A belief or action that most people think is wrong because it diagress with beliefs that generally accepted.**
 * faggot:**Bundle of sticks**
 * Eucharist: **Christian religious ceromony in which Christ's last meal, celebrating with his deciples with bread and wine.**
 * abstain: **To restrain yourself from doing what you want to do**
 * penance:**In particular religions an act that you give yourself to do, or a priest gives you to do in order to show that you are sorry for what you have done wrong**
 * beseeching: **Tone of the voice**
 * source:**a place, person or thing that you get something from**

__In section 1, //Heretical Beliefs//, the historian gives his account of a historical event. What is happening to Hogsflesh? What is the historian's “story” or main point of the article?__
 * Hogsflsh is being punished by the church for having a heretical belief. His punishment is to walk naked carrying bundle of sticks to the market place. The historians are trying to make a point that heretical belief would lead to severe punishment.**

__What are the roles of a historian defined by John Arnold? Do you agree or disagree with his assumptions? Can you think of any other roles?__
 * Jogn Arnold states that the roles of the historians are to record the past and "announce" it to the whole world. I agree with his assumptions. I believe historians can help us avoid mistakes that had happened in the past. Historians can specify tremendous moments in the past, encouraging nations to repeat its moment. Historians can change how people think and act just by recording the facts excluding its personal views.**

__What is meant by “treat(ing) their sources with fidelity?” Remember to put your response in your own words. Why is it important to remember this when reading historical references?__
 * Treating their sources with fidelity means to trust and believe their(historians) sources . This is important to remember when reading historical references because history is complex subject that contains diverse informations. However, if we tend to observe only one record,we would not be able to understand the whole event. To prevent that happening, it is important to look at diverse point of views and different informations, this will at least allow you to understand the concept of the event. **

__How can a single event be interpreted in more than one way? Can you think of an event in your life that historians could interpret with differing points of view?__
 * A single event can be interpreted in different ways. For example, a war can be a good example, in a war there are different people telling different stories. The soldiers that won the battle would tell us how well they fought and how the opponent was a coward. While the soldiers that lost the battle would tell us how cruel and sly the opponent was. However, the witness would tell the truth unless the witness has a favored side.**

__Talk to a family member or friend about something that happened to you both a long time ago. Examine how you both remember the incident and write about it. With that in mind, when attaching meaning to history, is it possible for a historian to be completely objective? Use examples from the incident you just discussed to reinforce your response.__
 * 3-4 years ago i had a big fight with my cousin (willnot specify). At that time we were both mad at each other. However, as time passed (hours) I began to calm down and have fun. I believed that my cousin was also having fun. However, when I asked him about it, he told me he was still upset at that time. This told me that people have different perspectives of a same event.**

__What problems may arise when historians practice subjective history? In what ways may subjective history be beneficial to the study of history? Think back to the incident you just discussed with your family member or friend. Why did it make sense for you to remember the event the way you did and for the other person to remember it the way he or she did? What does this tell us about history?__
 * If historians practice subjective history if would be hard to identify the facts and exclude opinions. I believe it would be beneficial to study history. It is because we can view diverse opinions and points of views to an event.**

__Why is every historian "a storyteller?" If all historians are storytellers and there are myriad versions of every story, can we trust historians? Why or why not?__
 * Every historian is a storyteller because they comprehend and relate events from the past. However, if all historians are storytellers and there are myriad verisons of every story, we can not completely trust historians because there is a possibility that the historians can state their opinion and confuse us with opinion and fact.**

__How did your view of history and historians change based on this reading? How will you approach history now that you have explored these views?__
 * I actually had some information that some historians state their opinions and can be biased. My previous Social Studies teacher told me once that the U.S History Textbook can be biased, since an American write wrote the U.S history book it can be lean to United States.**
 * After reading this article, I've got more understanding of subjective recording. Also, I've realized not all information that is given to me can be completely reliable.**

Why is an understanding of culture necessary in order to understand history?

It is essential to understand the culture of diverse countries. Culture acts as a boarder between nations and affects most of the nations life style to their actions. For example, culture can affect how people dress, foods they eat, beliefs and others. To coexist with different races, it is vital to understand other group of people. For example, the civil war would be a good example. Before the civil war the North (union) wanted to abolish slavery. However, the South(confederacy) disagreed because slavery was the main “resource” to the South. Disagreements lead to separation and separation lead to a civil war. In order to avoid conflict with other, we have to understand and tolerate each others difference. This society is a place where you can not live alone, it is a place where all people have to coexist and work together. ‍‍‍‍These misunderstanding between each other can be part of the history. ‍‍‍‍