Christine+Lee+TEEL+page

__Should we have limits for our access to information?__


 * **Topic sentence** || == Information has many purposes for many kinds of people, therefore it should not be accessed with total liberty. However the limits should be broad for innocuous reasons but also narrow for the safety of people. == ||
 * **Elaboration** || == Many pieces of information could be misused maliciously, such as government or personal information. Nevertheless, for the education of future generations we should not be entirely cut off from the intelligence of the world.== ||
 * **Examples/Evidence** || == During the Dark Ages, the Church and government totally limited the information exposed to public. Due to this they went through an age of no knowledge and no progress in technology. On the contrary, today where personal information can be easily accessed, many people are victims of crimes such as illegal hacking.== ||
 * **Explanation/Analysis** || ==Gathered from before we can make conclusions that limits to information is vital. If we have an excessive amount of limits, the society would plunge into stupidity. If we have no boundaries, there is no knowing of how maliciously it would be used to hurt people.== ||
 * **Link sentence** || == Access of information may be mandatory for us to evolve, but to evolve, we also need to be able to control obstacles that are hurtful to us. == ||